Extra username and password are essential for this resource. See Username and password webpage for details
In other circumstances as discussed supra pensionary benefits cannot be stopped on account of criminal charges after the retirement of two years; and, is violative from the law laid down via the Supreme Court inside the case of Haji Muhammad Ismail Memon, PLD 2007 SC 35. Consequently, the competent authority of the parent department with the petitioner plus the Chief Secretary, Sindh, are liable to release the pensionary amount with the petitioner and shell out the pension amount and other ancillary benefits to the petitioner to which he is entitled under the legislation within two months from the date of receipt of this order. The competent authority on the respondent can also be directed to recalculate the pensionary benefits from the petitioner and increases accrued thereon the withheld pensionary benefits with effect from stopping to date. Read more
116 . Const. P. 469/2022 (D.B.) Zain Ahmed V/S The I.G of Police and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi In the moment case, the guidelines as set forth would not apply, given that the criminal Court has not convicted the petitioner, alternatively he has been acquitted of the criminal charges based on evidence and it can be very well-settled legislation that once the civil servant is acquitted while in the criminal case, then on this quite charge he cannot be awarded in almost any punishment from the department and held him disqualified for that post because acquittal for all foreseeable future purposes. The aforesaid proposition has long been established at naught because of the Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case from the District Police Officer Mainwali and a couple of others v.
twelve. There isn't any denial from the fact that in Government service it is anticipated that the persons getting their character over board, free from any moral stigma, are to be inducted. Verification of character and antecedents is a condition precedent for appointment into a Government service. The candidates must have good character and provide two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above is that the only impediment to being appointed to some Government service is the conviction on an offense involving moral turpitude but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a method out or guise to perform away with the candidature of the petitioner. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Source: Order: Downloads 133 Order Date: fifteen-JAN-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
Amir Abdul Majid, 2021 SCMR 420. twelve. There isn't any denial from the fact that in Government service it is expected that the persons obtaining their character over board, free from any moral stigma, are to generally be inducted. Verification of character and antecedents is usually a condition precedent for appointment to your Government service. The candidates must have good character and supply two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above mentioned is that the only impediment to being appointed to a Government service could be the conviction on an offense involving moral turpitude but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a way out or guise to accomplish absent with the candidature from the petitioner. Read more
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming to the main case, It's also a effectively-recognized proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence within the Stricto-Sensu, implement to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary receive support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty with the charge, however, that is subject matter to the procedure provided under the relevant rules and never otherwise, to the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-recognize the evidence and to reach at its independent findings around the evidence.
The reason for this difference is that these civil legislation jurisdictions adhere to some tradition that the reader should have the capacity to deduce the logic from the decision as well as statutes.[four]
There are a great number of circumstances where death was never intended – even more where Individuals nominated inside the FIR were not present when the injury or death occurred. The death of a human being is really a tragic event. However the death of any living being is not any a lot less a tragic event.
Civil Courts retain jurisdiction over title disputes in partition matters. Agreement to sell does not confer title; it demands legal transfer of title. Agreement to sell must be created and properly exhibited in evidence. Declining relief based on an unproduced and un-exhibited sale agreement is legally unsustainable. Read more
Justia – a comprehensive resource for federal and state statutory laws, together with case regulation at both the federal and state levels.
In a few jurisdictions, case legislation can be applied to ongoing adjudication; for example, criminal proceedings or family regulation.
one. Judicial Independence: The court emphasized the importance of judicial independence plus the separation of powers.
A decreased court may well not rule against a binding precedent, although it feels that it is unjust; it might only express the hope that a higher court or even the legislature will reform the rule in question. examples of constitutional law cases When the court believes that developments or trends in legal reasoning render the precedent unhelpful, and wishes to evade it and help the legislation evolve, it could both hold that the precedent is inconsistent with subsequent authority, or that it should be distinguished by some material difference between the facts of your cases; some jurisdictions allow for your judge to recommend that an appeal be performed.
The residents argued that the high-voltage grid station would pose a health risk and potential hazard to local residents. In the long run, the court determined the scientific evidence inconclusive, even though observing the general trend supports that electromagnetic fields have detrimental effects on human health. The Court accepted the petitioner’s argument that it should adopt the precautionary principle established out while in the 1992 Rio Declaration around the Environment and Progress, the first international instrument that linked environment protection with human rights, whereby the lack of full scientific certainty should not be used being a reason to prevent environmental degradation.